Technical guidance and sample reports for security assessments.
Request a sample by email to review our approach to findings, evidence and remediation. Reports are shared privately, not hosted here.
Sanitised sample web application penetration testing deliverable illustrating application attack surface mapping, session lifecycle testing, business logic flaw documentation, and actionable developer remediation.
Sanitised sample network penetration testing deliverable detailing perimeter exposure analysis, protocol security, network segmentation testing, and prioritised infrastructure hardening.
Sanitised sample multi-tier penetration testing deliverable examining trust boundaries across connected application, service, and data layers, verified cross-component attack paths, and coordinated remediation.
In-depth technical guides covering assessment fundamentals, scoping calculations, testing methodology, cloud configurations and verified remediation workflows.
A vulnerability assessment enumerates exposed weaknesses; a penetration test establishes whether an attacker could compromise systems or data using them. Understanding the difference, the assessment lifecycle, and the deliverables you receive ensures your organisation extracts practical security value rather than a generic scanner printout.
Penetration testing is quoted and delivered in tester-days—the unit of engineering effort required to evaluate an attack surface. Understanding the technical drivers that determine tester-days allows buyers to compare proposals accurately and avoid artificial estimates.
Most assessment friction and testing delays occur before the first test packet is transmitted. Establishing clean target boundaries, staging environments, credential pairs, and emergency escalation paths ensures testing proceeds without operational interruption.
Runtime web application penetration testing evaluates an application as an adversary sees it; secure code review inspects the underlying implementation line by line. Neither approach replaces the other. Understanding their complementary strengths allows organisations to build effective defence-in-depth.
APIs fail differently from the graphical interfaces in front of them. Modern API attacks bypass the UI to manipulate raw object identifiers, exploit function-level permissions, and exhaust backend resources. Effective API testing requires rigorous authorization-matrix validation and deep protocol interrogation.
Mobile application security spans three distinct frontiers: the compiled client package installed on untrusted hardware, the local operating system runtime, and the backend cloud API. Effective testing requires combining static binary analysis, runtime dynamic instrumentation, and comprehensive backend validation.
External network testing assesses what an internet-based attacker can discover and compromise on your perimeter; internal testing evaluates what happens once perimeter defences are breached. Treating these services as interchangeable leaves critical blind spots in your defence-in-depth posture.
Cloud breaches rarely stem from zero-day flaws in the underlying hypervisor; they overwhelmingly result from customer identity misconfigurations, overly permissive storage policies, and public service exposure. A structured cloud review audits your control plane against established CIS and CSA standards.
A penetration test seeks to discover as many vulnerabilities as possible within a defined scope; a red team exercise emulates a specific threat actor attempting to achieve an explicit operational objective while testing your organisation’s detection and response capabilities.
Receiving a vulnerability report is only the beginning of security risk reduction. Translating technical findings into engineering tickets, prioritising fixes based on real-world exploitability, and conducting rigorous retesting ensures that vulnerabilities are permanently eliminated.